Kristján Valur Jónsson <krist...@ccpgames.com> added the comment: While I'm confident about the correctness of this implementation (it´s in production use right now) I´d like comments on the architecture.
- Are people comfortable with the notion of an include file with an inline implementation of portable condition variables like this? - Martin voiced concerns over having a _future_ compatible implementation in there with Windows 7 support only. I thought it cool to have around, since it strenghtens the "portability" design of the pattern. - Names of types/apis. Am I doing it right? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15038> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
