R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment:

Hmm.  Thinking about it, though, that might not work if there are other errors 
in the message, many of which are more benign.  Probably the raise_on_defect 
control is a little too coarse.

I've been thinking that we need a way to set the policy on an already existing 
message, which would make this work more usefully.  But that's a different 
issue.

----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25738/base64_payload_defects.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to