R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: Hmm. Thinking about it, though, that might not work if there are other errors in the message, many of which are more benign. Probably the raise_on_defect control is a little too coarse.
I've been thinking that we need a way to set the policy on an already existing message, which would make this work more usefully. But that's a different issue. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25738/base64_payload_defects.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com