Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> added the comment:

I've just attached 4 patches, one for each of the likeliest implementations.  
All 4 ran the test suite successfully.

In my mind, the "simple namespace" one is the best fit.  However, it involves 
adding a new built-in type (though a private one).  If that is too 
controversial or too much new stuff to iron out for 3.3, I'd be okay with any 
of the others.  In reality I'd like to see that new namespace type added to 
Python, but that's a proposition I'll take up elsewhere.  :)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14673>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to