Ezio Melotti <ezio.melo...@gmail.com> added the comment: Hi, this has been discussed already, and we took the decision to leave these out, since checking for subclasses is not as common as checking the type. If needed, this could still be implemented by the user, and possibly they could be added as recipes to the unittest doc. Michael what do you think?
---------- nosy: +ezio.melotti, michael.foord resolution: -> rejected stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> pending versions: +Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14819> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
