Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment:

FTR I asked Julien to provide his opinion as a user and he agreed that having 
just one --byte-compile/--no-byte-compile option pair seemed better than the 
existing names (where --compile and --optimize are unrelated).

I wanted to avoid --byte-compile=0 to generate pyc, because I expected people 
to interpret it as “disabled” instead of “optimization level 0”.  Thus the idea 
of using letters (and avoiding to use c and o as not all VMs have pyc and pyo 
files).

Note that the new spelling for --compile is the seemingly redundant 
--byte-compile=b, but that does not matter as it will be the default value so 
people won’t type it.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13400>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to