Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> added the comment: > I'm not sure what you're proposing to fix. It seems to save at > most a couple of lines of (obvious) code?
Well, I *did* specify low priority. Attached is the patch for what I had in mind. > At least Py_ssize_t *could* have a different width from "PyObject *". Not "Py_ssize_t", "Py_ssize_t *". ---------- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25505/larry.prune.skipitem.1.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14746> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
