STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@gmail.com> added the comment: > You mean that process_time() doesn't return seconds?
Yes, dt is not a number of seconds in the following example: t1=time.process_time(); (...); t2=time.process_time(); dt=t2-t1 > I see two options: either increase the total running time, > to make it really likely you'll get a chance to run > (or decrase the lower threshold), or use times(2), and > check the result against that (does Windows have such a syscall?). I wrote the test to check if time.process_time() measures the total CPU of the process, and not the CPU time of only the current thread. I'm tired of this PEP, so I just removed the test. I don't think that it is really interesting and it looks difficult to write a reliable test. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14428> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
