STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@gmail.com> added the comment: > "Andrew"+"Dalke" (*1000): -23.076923%
/python -m timeit '"Andrew"+"Dalke"' gives me very close results with Python 3.2 (wide mode) and 3.3. Somethings like 0.15 vs 0.151 microseconds. But using longer (ASCII) strings, Python 3.3 is 2.6x faster: $ python3.2 -m timeit -s 'a="A"*1000; b="B"*1000' 'a+b' 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.39 usec per loop $ python3.3 -m timeit -s 'a="A"*1000; b="B"*1000' 'a+b' 10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.151 usec per loop ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13621> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
