Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Perhaps the best quick fix would be to only cache small > PyStructObjects, for some value of 'small'. (Total size < a few > hundred bytes, perhaps.)
Or perhaps not care at all? Is there a use case for huge repeat counts? (limiting cacheability could decrease performance in existing applications) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14596> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
