Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment: I agree, for reasons stated. Having to skip over the wrong instructions made getting started a bit harder for me. I also think TortoiseHG should get more than just a mention. The initial re-creation of the recent DAG for each branch when starting up Workbench takes some time, but having the graph makes it immediately obvious whether the repository is in a proper state -- two heads for default and 2.7, three for 3.2 -- both before starting work after pulling from py.org and again when ready to push changes back.
---------- nosy: +terry.reedy _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14468> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
