Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > No one uses it? I'm surprised. I do and it seems to me by far the > easiest and safest way to maintain patches in progress when there is > constant churn.
Ah, good to know :) My wording was a bit too strong then. However, I rarely see mq-produced patches when processing patches from contributors. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14466> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
