James Hutchison <jamesghutchi...@gmail.com> added the comment: If I increase the cycles increased 10x with 3.2 I get:
int: 0.4219999313354492 Decimal: 24.20299983024597 CachingDecimal: 1.7809998989105225 The sample you have provided is basically what I'm using. See attached What about worst case hash calculation time for Decimal? How does the C code handle that? This is if I increase the values themselves by 100x, same number of loops as above int: 0.5309998989105225 CachingDecimal: 2.078000068664551 Decimal: 41.2979998588562 ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25100/cachedDecimal.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14478> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
