Marc-Andre Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> added the comment: Yury Selivanov wrote: > > Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment: > >> A monotonic clock is not suitable for measuring durations, as it may still >> jump forward. A steady clock will not. > > Well, Victor's implementation of 'steady()' is just a tiny wrapper, which > uses 'monotonic()' or 'time()' if the former is not available. Hence > 'steady()' is a misleading name.
Agreed. I think time.monotonic() is a better name. ---------- nosy: +lemburg _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14397> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
