Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshep...@gmail.com> added the comment: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:34, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshep...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment: >> >> A couple of thoughts on the draft HOWTO: >> >> I like the "verbosity" example, but I'd also like to see it continue on into >> introducing the "action='count'" alternative that allows "-vv" to set the >> verbosity level to 2, etc. > > I wonder if this usage is common enough to get an entry in this > introductory text. > >> I also find the idea of having higher verbosity levels that aren't supersets >> of lower verbosity levels to be an anti-pattern, so I'd prefer not to see it >> in an official HOWTO. To my mind, verbosity levels should be checked with >> ">=", never "==". > > I don't really understand this paragraph. Do you have an example to > compare with any of the examples in the attached patch?
After playing a bit more with this and thinking about it a bit, I do get your point. It makes a lot of sense. I will attach a patch soon, which will also include the count keyword. Thanks for the review. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14034> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
