Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment: I'd like to veto changing the meaning of 0, it's going to break somebody's code. It's easy enough to add some other keyword argument to request an unbuffered queue. Other than that, (1) and (2) seem fine to me. Please consider making these changes for multiprocessing as well.
For (3) I like the idea, but I think we should be more ambitious and instead add a way to wait for multiple locks (or other things) across the board, not just in the queue module. (Maybe integrating with I/O waits as well, though that feels too ambitious, and is likely to stifle any attempts at a cross-platform implementation.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14060> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
