Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment:

Aside: I, too, at first thought this would be a bad idea because it brings back 
the Python 2 issue of accepting some but not all Unicode strings. But then I 
realized that by their nature these functions only accepts a very specific set 
of characters -- so the restriction to (a subset of) ASCII is intrinsic to the 
functionality, and there is no possibility of confusion. If anything, accepting 
bytes is more likely to be confusing (they could be EBCDIC! :-). So no 
objection here. And a slight preference for ValueError.

----------
nosy: +gvanrossum

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13641>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to