Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> added the comment: >> Google "walk directory". First hit is a Rosetta code page with >> *recursive* walking implemented in various languages. So I guess it >> does have this connotation. Regardless, os.walk has been in Python for >> ages, and it's always been the go-to tool for recursive traversal. >> walkdir's name suggests the same. > > You still haven't explained what your problem is with the idea of an > explicitly recursive glob (as both "rglob" and "globtree" suggest). >
The problem is that I prefer the walkdir approach, because it solves a more general problem and overall more useful. This is also why I don't see how it makes sense to stop discussing it here and focus on rglob. They are related, after all! Anyway, I'm not sure what else I can add to the discussion. I'm starting to repeat myself, which means that I should just shut up :) I've stated my preference, and I understand and respect yours. So let's just see what others think. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13968> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
