Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 02:18 +0000, Phill a écrit : > Phill <beer...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Rather than listening on a socket, listening on a named pipe > > eg: > address = (r'\\.\pipe\Test', 'AF_PIPE') > listener = Listener(*address) > conn = listener.accept() > > It doesnt raise an exception when i run the script again a second time.
According to MSDN, this is normal: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365150%28v=vs.85%29.aspx However, there's also a flag named FILE_FLAG_FIRST_PIPE_INSTANCE that we could use in PipeListener, which would then raise an error if a listener pipe was created a second time. It would probably make more sense, although I don't know whether some programs may rely on creating a pipe multiple times. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8184> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
