Tim Golden <m...@timgolden.me.uk> added the comment: This is happening on Windows x86 against the current tip. The MS C runtime can handle older dates; it's just that we're taking 1900 off the year at some point. (At least, I think that's what's happening). FWIW you only need time.strftime to reproduce the error:
import time time.strftime("%y", (1899, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)) If no-one gets there first I'll dig into the timemodule strftime wrapper. ---------- nosy: +tim.golden _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13674> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com