Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: I don't know what the purpose of this feature is nor who the target users are. Trying to micro-manage the interpreter's resource allocation from Python code is certainly a losing battle, and does not warrant relying on implementation-specific APIs. Moreover, these days gc.collect() implicitly collects the freelists.
I therefore recommend rejecting this patch. ---------- nosy: +pitrou resolution: accepted -> rejected _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1953> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
