Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:

I agree with Roger that developing an extension elsewhere is the proper first 
step. I suspect that you will want to experiment with the exact behavior and 
interface. So I am closing this for now, though you can reopen later if there 
is a renewed proposal to change IDLE as distributed. But I would sooner 
incorporate some of the other extensions that have already been written and 
tested as part of IdleX.

Because I don't usually do the things that cause IDLE to crash, at least not 
while coding, and do use a fairly short code/F5-run test cycle, I am not sure I 
would need this much. On the other hand, a 5 or 10 minute timed backup might 
not be a bad idea.

----------
nosy: +terry.reedy
resolution:  -> later
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13571>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to