Davide Rizzo <sor...@gmail.com> added the comment: Mark, it's been a long time since I went through this bug and don't remember the details. Are you sure subtype_dealloc should not call PyType_Modified? It looked like the appropriate place at the time. In the example the reference cycle was introduced on purpose by the Python program. Maybe we can try and explore the reference graph again?
I understood while posting the patch that this would have impacted performance. But deallocation of a subtype is not something that happens a lot in most programs. An overall 4% looks huge though. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12149> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
