Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:
Very high-level comments on your patch:
- why an empty "dtrace" module?
- I'm worried that you're adding lots of delicate code inside critical core
functions. Perhaps most of it can be factored out in separate functions living
in another (dtrace-specific) C file? I don't think we really want to maintain
some asm("nop") in the GC module, and I'm not even talking about the madness in
ceval.c.
- instead of generating code data (line numbers etc.) up front, why not
generate and cache it lazily? that way, it would only be generated when the
probes are really used (IIUC)
For higher-level benchmarks, I suggest you take a look at
http://hg.python.org/benchmarks/
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13405>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
