Giampaolo Rodola' <g.rod...@gmail.com> added the comment:

New patch in attachment takes care of modifying empty() and queue property 
according with the new implementation.
With this, the API behaves the same as before (this was my main concern).
Also, it's smarter when it comes to cleaning up too many pending cancelled 
items:

if self._cancellations > 50 \
  and self._cancellations > (len(self._queue) >> 1):
     ...

Also, I made a little benchmark script (in attachment) to make sure that the 
speed of the rest of the API hasn't been significantly affected by this change:


BEFORE THE PATCH

test_cancel                    : time=0.66648 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000
test_empty                     : time=0.00026 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000
test_enter                     : time=0.00309 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000
test_queue                     : time=6.20777 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000
test_run                       : time=0.00746 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000


AFTER THE PATCH

test_cancel                    : time=0.00054 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000
test_empty                     : time=0.00031 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000
test_enter                     : time=0.00375 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000
test_queue                     : time=6.30314 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000
test_run                       : time=0.00716 : calls=1 : stdev=0.00000

----------
nosy: +josiah.carlson, josiahcarlson
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23785/cancel.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13451>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to