Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: As you can see in my commit, I made more changes to the code and simplified the tests. subprocess is definitely the way to test script functionality, it’s much cleaner than monkey-patching sys.argv; we even have higher-level helpers to do that in test.script_helper.
(BTW, the comment I made about mocking user input in my first reply makes no sense: I was confusing pysetup create and pysetup generate-setup :) I also mistakenly talked about test_run when the correct file was test_util.) ---------- resolution: -> fixed stage: test needed -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13205> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
