Ezio Melotti <ezio.melo...@gmail.com> added the comment: I don't think we need to mention that. Actually the tone of the whole paragraph could be relaxed a bit, because it first says that "any change **will** break code" (which is not true), except "new semantic, obviously" (which is not true either).
The whole sentence could also be dropped altogether IMHO. """ Basically just put yourself in the shoes of someone whose code will be broken by a change to pre-existing semantics. """ is already clear enough, and it could be rephrased to """ Basically just put yourself in the shoes of someone whose code will be broken by the change(s) introduced by the patch. """ to avoid talking about 'semantics'. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12296> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
