Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment: I'm thinking that we should offer a strict-option (off by default) and leave it at that. No need to break existing code. AFAICT, the OP is the only one to have had problems with this in-practice (the JSON module or its ancestor simplejson has been around for a long time).
Am marking this as a high priority but want to leave it open for a good while to get more comments before taking any action. ---------- assignee: -> rhettinger priority: normal -> high _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13212> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
