New submission from Stefan Krah <stefan-use...@bytereef.org>: Seen in test_multiprocessing:
==31662== 37 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 629 of 10,548 ==31662== at 0x4C2154B: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) ==31662== by 0x53BBE9: PyBytes_FromStringAndSize (bytesobject.c:98) ==31662== by 0x4E2363: posix_read (posixmodule.c:6980) ==31662== by 0x5759D8: PyCFunction_Call (methodobject.c:81) ==31662== by 0x48E294: call_function (ceval.c:3980) ==31662== by 0x4895E1: PyEval_EvalFrameEx (ceval.c:2605) ==31662== by 0x48C54F: PyEval_EvalCodeEx (ceval.c:3355) ==31662== by 0x48E786: fast_function (ceval.c:4078) ==31662== by 0x48E3C7: call_function (ceval.c:4001) ==31662== by 0x4895E1: PyEval_EvalFrameEx (ceval.c:2605) ==31662== by 0x48C54F: PyEval_EvalCodeEx (ceval.c:3355) ==31662== by 0x48E786: fast_function (ceval.c:4078) ---------- components: Extension Modules messages: 144764 nosy: skrah priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: posix_read: memory leak type: resource usage versions: Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13090> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
