Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: See http://bugs.python.org/issue12469, specifically http://bugs.python.org/issue12469#msg139831
""" > > When signals are unblocked, pending signal ared delivered in the reverse > > order > > of their number (also on Linux, not only on FreeBSD 6). > > I don't like this. > POSIX doesn't make any guarantee about signal delivery order, except > for real-time signals. > It might work on FreeBSD and Linux, but that's definitely not > documented, and might break with new kernel releases, or other > kernels. It looks like it works like this on most OSes (Linux, Mac OS X, Solaris, FreeBSD): I don't see any test_signal failure on 3.x buildbots. If we have a failure, we can use set() again, but only for test_pending: signal order should be reliable if signals are not blocked. """ Looks like we now have a failure :-) ---------- nosy: +haypo, neologix _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13084> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
