STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment:

> The second patch looks good. Tests?

Ok, I will try to write a new patch with tests.

> But, it *probably* shouldn't be applied to 2.7&  3.2 given that it is a 
> behaviour change.

I consider that this issue is a bug, so it should be fixed in 2.7 and 
3.2. I agree that *killing* the process is a behaviour change, but we 
can just close pipes on error for 2.7 and 3.2.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12494>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to