STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment: > The second patch looks good. Tests?
Ok, I will try to write a new patch with tests. > But, it *probably* shouldn't be applied to 2.7& 3.2 given that it is a > behaviour change. I consider that this issue is a bug, so it should be fixed in 2.7 and 3.2. I agree that *killing* the process is a behaviour change, but we can just close pipes on error for 2.7 and 3.2. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12494> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com