Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: > without-threads, it segfault: >
It's normal :-) _stack_overflow triggers - as it names implies - a stack overflow. However, as you can see in the output, faulthandler is now able to catch the SIGSEGV and display the backtrace (because it set up an alternate stack for the signal handler with sigaltstack). > However, if I run test_faulthandler.py, it seems to be ok: Yes: the test checks that the stack overflow was correctly caught by faulthandler. @Victor: can I commit the patch? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12868> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
