Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment:
> Yeah, but I think "exclusively" is quite misleading since it does not
> perform any locking of any kind.
It might be misleading, but I find it clear enough, and this name has been
endorsed by POSIX.
Furthermore, there's an added bonus: actually, with the old I/O layer, one can
already pass an 'x' flag to open, since it just calls fopen:
"""
cf@neobox:~$ strace -e open python -c "open('/tmp/foo', 'wx')"
[...]
open("/tmp/foo", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0666) = 3
cf@neobox:~$ strace -e open python -c "open('/tmp/foo', 'wx')"
[...]
open("/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/<string>", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT
(No such file or directory)
IOError: [Errno 17] File exists: '/tmp/foo'
"""
I don't know if it's documented behavior, but the OP in issue 12105 was using
it with python 2.
Changing it to 'x' would make such code backward-compatible.
Finally, when I read open('/tmp/foo', 'wx'), it's immediately clear to me
what's going on, while I'd have to look at open()'s documentation to find out
what the 'c' flag does.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12760>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
