Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> added the comment: Would an implementation detail note be inappropriate here? I only ask because it looks like the imp module's use of interp->modules is implementation specific.
Here's a patch for Doc/library/sys.rst that adds the note. ---------- assignee: -> docs@python components: +Documentation keywords: +patch nosy: +docs@python title: sys.modules gets special treatment -> sys.modules doc entry should reflect restrictions Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22760/sys_modules_doc.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12633> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
