R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: OK, I found the other issue and it looks like we agreed to use 'attributes and methods' where the reference was inclusive. I still think that it is less precise to think this way, but it is clearer exposition given the lack of a good term for non-method attributes. So now I agree that we should not change the existing glossary definition of attribute.
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12491> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
