Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: > @neologix: New try. Why did you remove your patch? >
Sorry, I completely forgot about this issue. Because it was incorrect (it would have fixed the SIGBUS, but would have produced incorrect results). IIRC, the problem is that those members are used in several places, so it requires a little bit more work to produce a clean patch. I'll try to provide a new one in a couple days, but since I don't have any OpenBSD box, I won't be able to test it myself. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12181> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
