Jonas Wagner <ve...@gmx.ch> added the comment: Hi Tal,
Thanks a lot for your feedback. My primary objective was to increase the test coverage for cgi.py. If it is a problem to have the additional tests in this patch I'm happy to create a new issue with a separate patch. The default value for the boundary was an oversight, sorry for that. You are right regarding the commented out boundary as well, I forgot to refresh the patch. Again, sorry. Do you think valid_boundary should contain a check to ensure it is a byte object? ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22567/cgi-coverage-2.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12411> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
