Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: > there's nothing an ABC can do to stop someone (for example) overriding > an abstract method or descriptor "foo" with "foo = 1".
I’ve find it useful to use an abstractproperty to specify an attribute that concrete subclasses have to define. Was that wrong? From a technical viewpoint, I replaced a method with a data attribute, but from a doc/human viewpoint, replacing a property with a regular attribute did not seem wrong to me. So, if there are guidelines about “almost certainly wrong” uses of the ABC machinery, they should IMO be documented. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11610> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
