Bugs item #1688274, was opened at 2007-03-26 07:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by collinwinter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1688274&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Documentation >Group: Python 2.6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Tommi Vainikainen (tvainika) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Python/C PyClass_* are not documented Initial Comment: Python/C API Reference Manual chapter 7.5 Other Objects does not contain subchapter for Class objects, but only Instance objects and many other are documented there. >From header I can find that at least PyClass_Check and PyClass_New exist, I >just don't know what those do until I take time to read source code... :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Collin Winter (collinwinter) Date: 2007-03-30 10:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1344176 Originator: NO I'll add a note to the docs for instance objects. Fixed in r54614. Thanks, Tommi. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tommi Vainikainen (tvainika) Date: 2007-03-30 08:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1753247 Originator: YES Actually one more thing: I think that chapter 7.5.2 Instance Objects would need also similar note about being relevant only for old-style classes. (At least I think it is only relevant for old style classes.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tommi Vainikainen (tvainika) Date: 2007-03-30 03:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1753247 Originator: YES Looks good for me. Actually the first pointer to new-style classes is the most important I think... :) (which I found out by myself after reporting this bug) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Collin Winter (collinwinter) Date: 2007-03-29 23:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1344176 Originator: NO Take a look at the attached patch and see if that says what you want. File Added: concrete.tex.diff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1688274&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com