Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment:
>> What would the value be for non-C Python implementations?
> I'm not really sure how this idea could have any value for those
> implementations, at least for the ones that can't make use of C
> extensions at all
The question was about the meaning of a new “compiler” environment marker.
Would it be set to the empty string in Jython? Not available? Or do you think
that there is no issue, since Jython would not try to compiler C files?
> I'm not entirely sure how common this is; even within those people
> who write C extensions, but I'm pretty sure some problems are
> unavoidable, such as compiler-specific options when linking to
> external libraries or compiler-specific ways of specifying
> compatibility options.
The SO page contains some pretty crude hacks.
Instead of putting more things into the PEP 345 environment markers, why not
extend the extra_compile_args field to take a dictionary mapping regexes to
match compiler names and versions to arguments?
In code:
Extension(..., extra_compile_args={'gcc': '-fo',
'gcc .* 4.2': '-foo'})
In setup.cfg:
[build_ext] (or maybe extensions section)
extra_args =
gcc = -fo
gcc .* 4.2 = -foo
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12242>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
