Max <m...@alleged.net> added the comment: Fair enough.
I think it would make sense for the string methods to also accept single ints where possible as well: For haystack and needles both strings: [haystack.find(n) for n in needles] For both bytes, it's a bit contortionist: [haystack.find(needles[i:i+1]) for i in range(len(needles))] One ends up doing a lot of the [i:i+1] bending when using bytes functions. ---------- type: behavior -> versions: -Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12170> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
