Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: > Even if used a different file name, you still have to set up two > different sets of directives.
I was assuming this would not be a problem: the .inputrc (or hypothetical .editrc file) is written once for all applications, it’s not a Python-specific task. What I didn’t see is that users do not necessarily know about which file is used, so it’s at least a doc problem. For the perceived problem with licensing, I’m adding Martin to nosy, not because he’s a PSF director but because he’s had to make similar choices for the Windows installers. Martin, here’s the context: the Mac installer sometimes builds readline with the real readline or libedit. There’s a doc problem which can be solved either by always using the same lib. The easiest to implement now would be choosing readline, but Ned says: “The main drawback to the trivial suggestion is that it continues to pull in GNU readline, which is now GPLv3-licensed, into the python.org OS X installers. In general, we try to avoid shipping GPL-licensed software since it can complicate the allowable usages of the installed Python.” Could you provide advice? ---------- nosy: +loewis _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10666> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
