STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment: > Thanks, Victor. You caught me by surprise a bit
Oh, I thought that the patch was ready to be commited. > I had some more minor changes to that patch pending, > so I've committed those separately. You should add "Issue #11888: " prefix to your commit messages so a bot automatically add comments for the new commits to this issue. > "Fix cut-and-paste typo in comment: log10 -> log2." Oh, I didn't notice it, but Terry Reedy > "Fix nonunique test ids in math_testcases.txt." Oh, I didn't notice it: why do we need explicit identifiers? Can't we use the line number or something like that? What happens if two tests have the same identifier? Is the first test skipped? > Any news from the buildbots? Yes, most of them are happy. Some of them are busy (don't have test log2() yet), others are unhappy but not because of log2(). Said differently: log2 tests pass on most buildbots, but we have to wait 12 hours or maybe one day to wait for all buildbots. If the test pass on all buildbots, I will commit issue11888-part2.patch to use the system log2 function. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11888> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
