Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > pending_signals-3.patch: > - don't check for pending signals in sigwait() > - pthread_kill() doc: it is not a good idea to say that pthread_kill() with > signum=0 can be used to check if a thread identifier is valid => such test > does crash (SIGSEGV) on my Linux box. I changed the doc to say that it can be > used to check if a thread is still running (which is different). > - add a dedicated test for sigpending() > - doc: explain how to get a thread identifier for pthread_kill() > - don't compile pthread_kill() without threads: you cannot get a valid > thread identifier without the _thread module > > I think that the patch is ready to be commited. Anyone for a last > review? (antoine, neologix?)
It looks good to me. It's very nice to have all these extra functions :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8407> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
