Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: > Also I want to point out that I find the information very hard to > find as a human. The fact that integers are based on `numbers.Number` > is -- at this point in time where 95% of all Python developers don't > know about the `numbers` module or abstract base classes in general > -- an implementation detail and as such should not affect the way > `int` is documented. Not really: int is not based on numbers.Number, but the ABC serves as documentation.
> I propose to have decent class references for int, str, ... similar > to the reference for dict -- that is, document all attributes and > methods in one place and make them referencable. Hum, I think this should be fixed, but not with tons of text containing duplicated information (once for int, once for long, once for float...) Ezio: you recently fixed a similar problem with collections ABCs methods; what’s your opinion here? ---------- nosy: +ezio.melotti _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11977> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
