Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:

Markus, I agree with Martin that this patch would go against current policy and 
should be closed. Rather than close it myself, I will try to persuade you to do 
so.

First, CPython is actually in the process of 'slimming down', of removing, not 
adding support for minority platforms. Please look at
ttp://python.org/dev/peps/pep-0011/
and notice that support for 5 types of systems has been removed for 3.3 and 2 
more are slated for removal in 3.4.

Second, buildbots are intended to be remote slaves of the master. When they 
finish one build, test, and report, there is (or soon will be) usually another 
version ready to test. I am pretty sure that does not work behind a corparate 
firewall. In any case, if you want to use a machine for anything else, you are 
better with a script that pulls, builds, and tests when *you* decide. Also, 
buildbots are usually dedicated to one version. You might want to test your 
patch with multiple versions.

Third, if you keep the code, then no one else can mess with it, even 
accidentally. You also get to decide exactly which Python versions you wish to 
support or not support.

Fourth, I think the few advantages of integration can be obtained by other 
means that are not much more difficult. This includes a link on the 'Other 
ports' page for the appropriate versions.

----------
nosy: +terry.reedy

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11937>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to