R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: Sorry, didn't see that you'd figured it out in the midst of your other comments not relevant to this bug.
If the re were simpler it wouldn't actually be *testing* the function under test, and so would be a useless test. (It would show that the function produced output, but not that the output was from the ls -ld command) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11946> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
