Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: [Zooko] > I just read back through this ticket, but I didn't understand exactly > what MAL wanted to have different from what this Python function > currently does:
It may be this: > It's better to follow the approach taken by lsb_release and then > add calling lsb_release as one of the methods taken by > _dist_try_harder() (using platform.popen()) should the parsers > fail. > This avoids spawning a process in most cases. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1322> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
