Marc-Andre Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> added the comment: Ezio Melotti wrote: > > Ezio Melotti <ezio.melo...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > PEP 3147 says[0]: > """ > For backward compatibility, Python will still support pyc-only distributions, > however it will only do so when the pyc file lives in the directory where the > py file would have been, i.e. not in the __pycache__ directory. pyc file > outside of __pycache__ will only be imported if the py source file is missing. > """ > > Does that mean that there could be cases where untagged pyc files are used in > 3.2+?
Yes... even though we did discuss using the same tagging support in that scenario as well, at least for 3.3. > In that case the patch should be ported to 3.2 and 3.3 too. > > [0]: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3147/#rationale ---------- title: Unicode-width dependent optimization leads to non-portable pyc file -> Unicode-width dependent optimization leads to non-portable pyc file _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5057> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
