STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment: Le vendredi 08 avril 2011 à 17:31 +0000, Antoine Pitrou a écrit : > Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > > > I did a similar test on Windows: test_io takes ~19.1 sec with and > > without timeout. > > You may want to test with test_argparse.
Oh... test_argparse has 1608 test! Benchmark on Linux: - without timeout: 18.931 sec - with timeout/function call: 19.436 sec So on this test suite, the overhead is 2.7%. The current timeout implementation has an overhead near 0% on the same test suite (I tried to compute the overhead, but I found -0.2% which looks wrong :-)). I'm too lazy to start Windows for another benchmark tonight. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11800> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
