Rainer Schaaf <r...@pdflib.com> added the comment: fixing this for the next version of course would be acceptable.
As I can use the extension (not setting Py_LIMITED_API) even with 3.2.0 it is not a big problem. I only loose the benefit of Py_LIMITED_API and will have to release another version of the binding later on. > Would you prefer to see a compiler error indicating that you are using > a function not available in 3.2.0 (with an option of opting into > 3.2.1+)? I fear I don't understand exactly what is meant here. For me it was enough to get the linker error telling me it is not working. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11626> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
